Compare and contrast the following types of economic evaluation,… 1 answer below »

Compare and contrast the following types of economic evaluation, and provide an example of each: A) Cost of illness studies; B) Cost identification; C) Cost minimization studies; D) Cost consequence analysis; E) Cost-effectiveness analysis; F) Cost-utility analysis; and G) Cost-benefit analysis.
B. The local Department of Public Health (DPH) is starting a set of programs aimed at reducing childhood obesity among young children. The programs will be completely funded by a new special tax earmarked for these programs only. An expert panel recommends 6 (six) alternatives (A to F) for consideration depending upon budget size.All alternatives are mutually exclusive; i.e. can be implemented as a stand-alone project. Using cost and effectiveness data for these projects in the table, first complete the table and then respond to the questions below:

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Compare and contrast the following types of economic evaluation,… 1 answer below »
For as low as $13/Page
Order Essay
(# of kids)
Cost- Effectiveness Ratio Incremental Cost Incremental Effectiveness Incremental Cost- Effectiveness Ratio
C E C/E ?C ?E ?C/?E
10,000,000 12,000
20,000,000 17,000
30,000,000 20,000
40,000,000 24,000
50,000,000 35,000
60,000,000 41,000

C. The Department of Revenue estimates that the special tax dedicated to funding Director’sInitiative for 2014 will be $35 million. Guided by purely economic effectiveness concepts, which project(s) should the Director select and why?(The Director cannot spend more than the annual tax revenue; however, leftover funds can be carried over to the next year.)

  • Will your answer change if the tax revenues were to be $70 million? Why?
  • Will your answer to Question 2 change if the tax revenues were to be $120 million? Why?

D. Using the following table, complete a cost-effectiveness analysis to respond to the questions below:

Treatment Cost per Treatment QALYs Gained
800 34
400 29
0 0
1000 39
200 12
600 29
  • Rank the treatments by health benefit (more QALY = more benefit).
  • Identify and indicate which treatment(s) are dominatedfor elimination.
  • Show your work in calculating the ICER between each treatment option and the next most expensive option, eliminating treatment options that are not economically rational in the process due to extended dominance (higher ICER than next most expensive treatment).
  • Given your calculations, and I recognize there is limited information provided so do not over-complicate, make a recommendation on which treatment should be pursued and why.

E. Consider that two drugs are available for the management of diabetic patients. The first drug costs $4,000 over 10 years. The new drug costs $7,600 over 10 years. Theoutcome measure, Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY),with the first drugis 8.0 over 10 years for diabetic patients, butthe QALY will improve to 9.2 with the new drug. Show you work and calculate the ICER for the new drug.
F. A public healthsmoking cessationprogram is designed to last for 3 years. The cost of implementing the program in Year 1 is $25,000; in Year 2 is $23,000; and in Year 3 is $45,000. Calculate the present value of theentireprogram assuming a discount rate of 4% and costs occur at the end of each year.Show your work.

Year Cost Discount Factor Present Value
1 $25,000 .9615
2 $23,000 .9246
3 $45,000 .8890
Total $93,000

G. The per capital annual cost of acquiring and maintaining a CT scanner is $427,650, while the per capital medical benefits are $346,125. What is the benefit-to-cost ratio for this project? Should it be pursued?
H. The health program budget of a voluntary agency is $60,000. The agency wants to adopt interventions from the list of four interventions in the table below to maximize health improvements. Which of the interventions should the agency adopt? Why?

Intervention Cost-effectiveness Ratio Budget Needed
A 420 $31,000
B 110 $45,000
C 250 $15,000
D 600 $14,000

I. The following table, in which all figures are in millions of dollars, summarizes the results ofarecent cost-benefit analyses of five government projects:

Project Social Benefits Social Costs Net benefits B to C Ratio
A $100 $125
B 110 100
C 250 125
D 100 25
E 200 100

  • Compute the net gains (i.e., net social benefits) and the benefit-cost ratio for each project.
  • If the government wanted to maximize social welfare (i.e. net social benefit), which one project listed above should be undertaken? Briefly explain.
  • If the government wanted to maximize the return on its investment, which one project listed above should be undertaken? Briefly explain.
  • If the government’s budget was constrained to $125 million, which project or projects should it choose in order to maximize social welfare? Briefly explain. [Note: For purposes of answering this question, assume that social costs and the government’s budgetary costs are identical.]

J. An insurance company wishes to determine which of five new procedures should be implemented. They decide to perform a Cost-Benefit Analysis to help them make their determination. The results of the analysis are shown in the table below.
Present value of Gains, Losses, and Costs of 5 different procedures (in thousands)

Gains Losses Costs Benefits
(Gain – Loss)
Net Benefit (Benefit – Cost)
200 25 100
200 50 200
450 50 300
100 10 100
650 0 500
  • If the company decides to implement all procedures with positive net benefits, which procedures will be implemented?
  • If the company decides that it can have total costs of up to $550,000, which procedures should be implemented in order tomaximized total net benefits?

K. The HRQL scores of diabetic patients with and without treatment are given in the table below. Complete the table to calculate the effectiveness of treatment (compared to no treatment) over these five years:

Year HRQL Score without Treatment HRQL score with treatment Difference
1 .8 .9
2 .7 .9
3 .6 .9
4 .5 .8
5 .4 .8

L. Amiddle-agedperson undergoingan amputationis expected to have a life expectancy of 30 years as a result of theprocedure. However, he/she will remain in a less than perfect health state duringthe remainderof his/her life. It is assumed that the health state score will likely be between 0.6 and 0.8. Calculate the quality adjusted life expectancy for the health state range above.Show your calculation.
M. Calculate the life years lost due to car accident for a 28 year-old driver using table below.

Age (years) Life expectancy at age
15-24 78.5
25-34 79
35-44 79.6
45-54 80.6
55-64 82.3

N. Listed below are the course of events during an Influenza season. SKETCH THESE PROBABILITIES IN A DECISION TREE MODEL. Hint: starting point is “no vaccine”: if no vaccine is provided, 90% remain well and 10% become ill.Of those who become ill, 80% recovers without using any medical care but 20% visit a doctor.Of those who seek care from a doctor, 99% recover and 1%will requirehospitalization.Of those who recover without any medical care, 5%arehospitalized and 95% recover.